Belden Namah |
"I was a business man before I was an
MP," Belden Namah, Deputy Prime Minister of PNG has often stated. "I'm in the multi-billion dollar logging
business."
And so he is.
He's also an investor in luxury overseas
properties, a big gambler and owns other unrelated overseas businesses and
flies in private aircrafts.
If all of those things, spoken in the same
sentence, don't ring any alarm bells…they ought to.
Logging
The World Bank, this week, released a press
statement about illegal logging and its proceeds. It states that in some
countries up to 90% of logging is illegal.
Some logging, though, is legal and is just
another innocuous business enterprise, isn't it?
Well… not really.
It's been 25 years since there was a
Commission of Inquiry into logging in PNG - the conclusions were damning and
there's no evidence anything has changed.
Carried out by Justice Thomas Barnett, the
report found that the industry was "unpoliceable" and "beyond
reform."
So damaging to the industry were the
findings that they were never tabled in parliament and there is no copy of the
report still extant in PNG. The original
documentation (to be used as evidence) was destroyed in a suspicious fire at
the PNG Finance Department building around 1990.
Will such a Commission of Inquiry ever happen
again in PNG? Well not while the
Minister for Forestry and Climate Change is himself a
"Multi-billion-dollar logger."
The Barnett Report documented a corrupt
practice called 'transfer pricing'. Assets
for sale, (logs) are undervalued at point of harvesting but sold for an
inflated price at point of sale (overseas).
The difference is pocketed and the company avoids, tax, landowner
royalties and other obligations.
For the multi-billion-dollar logging company
the persistent problem with transfer pricing is how to account for all those
ill-gotten gains?
The company needs to make the money seem
like it comes from legitimate sources - they need to 'launder' the money.
Money
Laundering
The Barnett Report mentioned centres like
Singapore and Hong Kong as places that were often used to store corrupt monies
before they're cleaned up. And, in spite
of the publicity 'transfer pricing' gained from the report the practice
purportedly continues unabated.
ON 22 NOVEMBER 2011, WHEN THE LOGGING,
DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA, MINISTER FOR FORESTRY AND CLIMATE
CHANGE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE IN PARLIAMENT HE WAS FINISHING OFF HIS 'BUSINESS' IN
SINGAPORE AND HONG KONG.
He returned to PNG on 23 November and was
back in parliament on 24 November.
Just 5 days later, the incident with the
Falcon Jet occurred. It was on the way
home from Malaysia - allegedly carrying a large amount of cash.
Could this have been the culmination of the
'business' being attended to in Singapore and Hong Kong just the week
before? Just asking.
It is interesting to note that a new report
on money laundering compiled by Australian regulator AUSTRAC identified that
smuggling cash across borders "…is a common [unsophisticated] money laundering
method around the world."
It can't be that hard really if you have a
private plane and your political status gives you a measure of protection, can it?
As for the Malaysians, I wonder which
particular company they were from, as PNGBlogs has already posted an article that alleges that the same 'deal' had
been done twice with two separate companies and, somewhere, $10 million dollars
had gone missing. Wherever that money
has ended up, it will also need to be laundered.
Furthermore, the Special Agricultural
Business Leases (SABLs) usually for Palm Oil plantations, are highly
controversial and the subject of an inquiry.
Blind Freddy knows that so many are just a
back-door entrée into the "multi-billion dollar logging
business."
Nevertheless the Bewani Oil Palm Company
was granted a 10-year tax holiday because they had to first clear the land (of
trees). Ha! What're the chances that that's all they'll
do?
But getting back to money laundering and
the Falcon Jet, another named method to launder money was to use 'Professional's'
-through lawyers' trust accounts, for example.
I could make the connection for you, dear reader, but I'm sure you're
way ahead of me, and more than capable of making your own.
Past
sins - unrepented?
The past sins (alleged) of Namah keep
coming back to haunt him, such as his escapade at the Star Casino last April,
recently uncovered by Sydney Morning Herald that Namah's lawyers have categorically stated to be a case ofmistaken identity.
The trouble with that defence is that
casinos in Australia have very rigid regulations to abide by. In the high-rollers room where Namah was
allegedly playing last April AUSTRAC has stated that:
" …in these rooms,…casinos closely
monitor and track VIP and high-stakes gaming activity."
Why? Because casinos are one of the main
vehicles for money laundering.
Money can easily be passed off as
legitimate winnings. Authorities are
aware of this.
David Chaikin, an academic at Sydney
University and the author of a book titled Corruption and Money Laundering explained that money-laundering legislation was
originally devised to attack the financially powerful and corrupt. He further noted that it invariably led to
those in political power.
However, when you have a high-profile
player, such as a politician from a neighbouring country, politics tends to
clash with law enforcement and good international relations start needing to be
factored in.
Chaikin also pointed out that Australian
governments have historically tended to handle casinos with kid gloves as they
were a significant source of revenue.
"There has been no real rigor in
carrying out enforcement," he stated.
Under those circumstances it makes an
overseas casino quite an attractive proposition to launder some ill-gotten
gains, especially for a visiting politician.
How much money did you take away with you
last April, Mr Namah?
Where is it now?
Where did it come from in the first place?
Just asking.
Luxury
acquisitions.
Buying luxury items, such as real estate,
is also a recognised method of money laundering according to AUSTRAC
AT THE END OF OCTOBER LAST YEAR NAMAH WAS
ON THE GOLD COAST MEETING WITH REAL ESTATE AGENTS.
While Namah's lawyers maintained that he
was buying the Samoan properties for a business partner in Australia, the Samoa Observer told of how Namah and his"partner" viewed one property together.
She liked it so much that they bought it on
the spot, apparently. This contradicts
Namah's claim of a distant 'third party'.
And, although Namah threatened to sue the newspaper he never did.
The editor responded to the threat and
demand for an apology by saying "…we advise that the story…is factual, it
is the truth, and it is in the public interest…we see there is nothing to
apologise for."
Nevertheless, nothing came of the investigation
into this property buying and its suspected links to money laundering.
Why not? The Samoan authorities certainly suspected
money laundering.
Legitimate
businesses
Laundering money through legitimate
businesses can be effective. Lending out
the suspect dollars and getting repayments in clean money certainly would muddy
the waters regarding the provenance of the capital.
Samoan authorities and international
agencies had their suspicions. Their investigations were stymied at the PNG end
apparently.
What does the Leadership Code Commission of
PNG say about all this?
Why is the Ombudsman's Commission silent?
Is Belden Namah "above the law?"
With his recent substantial attack on the
PNG judiciary, I guess the law is now what he says it is.
By Susan Merrell Via PNG Blogs
Are you in need of a loan? Do you want to pay off your bills? Do you want to be financially stable? All you have to do is to contact us for more information on how to get started and get the loan you desire. This offer is open to all that will be able to repay back in due time. Note-that repayment time frame is negotiable and at interest rate of 3% just email us creditloan11@gmail.com
ReplyDelete