by Tanya Lahies & Jaive
The
Oneil – Dion (‘ODion’)National Government pursuit of a K6 billion loan
from China to repair and develop the nation’s poor state of
infrastructure continues to be a most debated topic in Papua New Guinea.
While
critics argue that the proposed loan is too large and the ODion
Government must be transparent on the terms of the loan agreement, the
Government continues to remain tight lipped, only stating that this soft
loan from the EXIM Bank of China is meant to be a rescue package for
PNG’s poor state of infrastructure, especially the Highlands highway and
other major infrastructure that have fallen apart over the last 37
years of this country’s independence.
Treasury
Minister Don Pomb Polyed has stated that the total reconstruction of
the Highlands Highway from Lae (Morobe) to Mt Hagen (WHP) and Mt Hagen
to Kopiago (SHP) and Mt Hagen to Porgera (Enga) will cost around K3
billion, which this loan will make possible.
Also
new works will become possible under this funding. These include
building road links that will connect the whole country to the nations
capital, Port Moresby.
In
Port Moresby, the NCD Governor Governor Powes Parkop is an early and
vocal political supporter of the EXIM Bank deal. He has plans to add
significant road infrastructure in the next five years to meet the
growing demands of the ever expanding city.
These
plans will include a fly-pass over the Kookabara Street from Central
Waigani to Jacksons International Airport and new roads from Gerehu to
9mile road, 9mile to Dogura and a Tokarara to Hanuabada by-pass. Also
major rehabilitation work will be carried out at 6mile to the old
Jackson’s Airport terminal, the Erima to 9mile road will be expanded and
the Erima-Wildlife to Morata road developed further.
However
this work requires a budget of around K900 million which NCDC
Government would need to raise. Hence he views the Chinese deal
important to his plans.
In Lae, PNG’s investment hub, the EXIM loan will be used to improve roads there as well.
There
is no denying the truth, that Papua New Guinea needs a major
intervention of some sort to fix our major economical roads and also
connect the vast majority of our prime agricultural lands to the major
resource projects and to the commercial and industrial hubs of Port
Moresby and Lae.
This K6 billion loan will no doubt help to assist all this.
But there are some issues that the Government needs to deal with.
Firstly, transparency issues.
Everyone wants to know what will be the terms of the loan agreement from the EXIM Bank of China.
This
bank is not new to Papua New Guinea. In 2010, the EXIM Bank came to the
aid of the US$300 million Pacific Marine Industrial Zone (PMIZ) in
Madang, where the bank provided a US$71million concessional loan for its
construction. Under the terms of the loan, a Chinese contractor was
awarded the infrastructure contract to develop the site. This company
was China Shenyang International, an unknown company. Also under this
agreement, 70 percent of the project was to go exclusively to a Chinese
developer using Chinese technology, labour equipment and equipment-
while restricting PNG firms to 30 percent of the project. This has
caused a lot of problems and a court case this month in Madang may test
the validity of the agreement.
So
is the EXIM Bank’s PMIZ financing model in Madang a preview of the
larger proposed loan from EXIM? Will the contracts for the
infrastructure work including the Highlands Highway go to the Chinese
companies using Chinese technology, labour and equipment? These
questions need to be answered.
Secondly,
the Government needs to tell us how will we pay back the loan.
Speculation is rife on how this will be done. The blogger Tavurvur in this excellent article on the Chinese Loan speculates that EXIM Bank is a creature of habit, and will use its model in Africa for Papua New Guinea.
The model is generally termed the ‘Angolan Model.’
Tarvuvu
explains that in African states such as Angola, Nigera, Gabon
Democratic Republic Of Congo and Guinea, the EXIM Bank has given very
large concessional loans in return for commodity off-take agreements,
which means (in very simplified terms) that these various countries pay
of the loan by supplying daily quotas of Oil, Iron Ore, Copper, Cobalt,
Bauxite and whatever commodities that are stated in the agreement.
As Tarvuvur states, “What
The Opposition and it seems everybody has missed, and what I strongly
suspect to be the case, is that EXIM’s K6 billion loan will not be paid
back via the regular financial instalments dictated in the standard
terms and conditions of a loan and disbursed through the budget
process under the Department of Treasury’s watch, but instead, it will
be accommodated for through a concessional commodity-for-finance
agreement where the State will provide China with a minimum daily supply
of oil and/or LNG in exchange for the financing of its expenditure
objectives.”
Papua
New Guinea is a very attractive commodity resource for China. With the
PNG LNG project, the InterOil LNG project, the Wafi-Golpu Copper and
Gold Project all expected to be online in the next ten years, it would
be in China’s development interest to secure its presence here.
However
if such a commodity-for-finance loan agreement is mapped out, then the
lawyers of Papua New Guinea will need to be very smart in drafting the
agreement as it will exist outside the current laws and processes for
international financial assistance and loans as managed by the
Department of Treasury. It could be challenged in court.
This
loan agreement will also affect the public tendering processes of Papua
New Guinea, the role and function of the Department of Works and
Transport, and poses major sovereignty issues as it stipulates an active
discrimination of Papua New Guinean companies, and will affect the PNG
Labour Department, the Immigration Department, the IPA and IRC offices
as well as others.
As well as these legal and sovereign issues, there are also other domestic issues that cause concern.
One
can say that this proposed loan would be an even larger band-aid
solution to devastating internal problems that are still unaddressed.
Papua
New Guinea governments, past and present, have yet to deal with the
major issue of contractor rorting in the maintenance/upgrading and
development of infrastructure in PNG.
A
major reasons for our roads being so bad is because politicians have
hijacked what is an effective process for awarding tenders and
monitoring contracts for road and infrastructure works, preferring to
award contracts to cronies, friends and to themselves through the use of
proxies. While Department of Works engineers and the rest of PNG shake
their heads in disgust, these shoddy contractors and consultants chew
through millions and millions of Kina every month without doing work of
the quality and consistency required.
If
the loans agreement is not exclusively for Chinese contractors, will
the politicians award the same contractors, firms and consultants that
have hijacked road works in PNG with these major jobs? And if they do,
will they finish these tasks? The biggest threat may not be the Chinese
cutting us out, but our own cheating us.
And
then there is corruption. The Parliament Public Affairs committee has
estimated that up to K2 billion in Government expenditure has
‘vanished’ from the system with no accountability or records. PNG’s
corruption will effect this Loan agreement and its application. We can
only hope it will not be to the extent that it is at now.
The loan may also have some positive affects on PNG, apart from infrastructure works.
It
could be used to force MVIL to pay directly to the loan facility the
millions it makes from all the charges drivers and vehicle owners have
to pay every year.
Also
the National Roads Authority will be forced to be more entrepreneurial
as a state agency, so we should see more user –pay initiatives on the
roads and cities such as weigh-in stations, toll bridges, parking meters
and other ideas.
Furthermore,
the O’Dion Government has mentioned that the proposed loan will also
help develop other infrastructure in PNG, like capital works for the
Yonki Hydro Project, and Telikom PNG and other SOE’s.
Whatever
happens, we wait to see whether the Government will negotiate terms,
and if so, that will no doubt will be the next stage of development and
debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment